Markets BIS warns stablecoins are more like ETFs than actual money, and they're creating FX risk BIS's latest annual report dives into stablecoins and AI trends. By Omkar Godbole , AI Boost | Edited by Jamie Crawley Jun 29, 2026, 8:51 a.m. 3 min read Make preferred on Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email Make preferred on BIS says stablecoins are more like ETFs. Summary Show The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) argues that stablecoins function more like exchange-traded funds than true money, as their prices often deviate from par and redemptions can be slow or uncertain. Stablecoin transfers "settle neither directly nor indirectly on central bank balance sheets," and "they cannot currently ensure exchange at par across issuers and blockchains under all conditions," BIS said. The report warns that dollar-pegged stablecoins are accelerating dollarization in vulnerable economies, undermining local currencies and evading traditional capital controls. The crypto industry has long pitched stablecoins, tokens pegged to fiat currencies, as the future of blockchain-based money and payments. But the Bank for International Settlements' (BIS) latest annual report is throwing cold water on that narrative. The report argued that stablecoins are acting less like money and more like exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or other alternative investment vehicles, whose units allow traders to gain exposure to a wide range of assets held by the fund. The hallmark of true money is that it is accepted as a means of payment "with no questions asked." When you pay with dollars at the grocery store, malls, airports, hotels, or just about anywhere, nobody questions its legitimacy or its value. Whether it's a physical bill or a bank deposit, it's expected to be worth exactly its face value. Secondary-market prices of tokenized versions of fiat currencies deviate from par, though mostly moderately. In other words, the token doesn't always trade at exactly $1. That's just like an ETF, which typically trades at a slight premium or discount to the fund's net asset value. Redemptions also aren't as smooth as widely perceived, meaning investors converting a stablecoin back to cash may not always get an instant, guaranteed exchange at par value, much like ETF share redemptions can involve delays or costs depending on the fund structure. "Redemption frictions are common, indicating that current stablecoin designs resemble exchange-traded fund (ETF) shares rather than means of payment," the report said. More importantly, stablecoin transfers "settle neither directly nor indirectly on central bank balance sheets," and "they cannot currently ensure exchange at par across issuers and blockchains under all conditions." This is unlike a bank deposit, which is ultimately backed by access to central bank money. The BIS believes a stablecoin's value is determined by the market's confidence in the issuer's reserves and redemption mechanism — not by a direct, guaranteed claim on the monetary system, as with a bank deposit. Stablecoins also fail to act as money is the cash-in-advance model, whereby an issuer mints a new token only once a user deposits the equivalent cash, according to BIS. This 100% pre-funding requirement means an issuer can't flexibly expand supply to meet economic needs, the way a commercial bank does by issuing loans that create new deposit money on its balance sheet without waiting for a customer to walk in with cash first. Foreign exchange nightmare Crypto was supposed to be an alternative to fiat, especially the dollar. Stablecoins are doing the opposite, and accelerating dollarization in the process, the BIS said. The report found rising flows of non-dollar currencies into US dollar-pegged stablecoins, and said these flows can weaken domestic currencies in the spot market. They also expose friction in arbitrage between crypto markets and conventional foreign exchange (FX) markets, and may raise the cost of buying dollars through the FX swap market. The BIS frames this as a new, faster version of an old problem: deposit dollarization, where households create foreign-currency bank deposits during periods of macroeconomic instability in the home country. The same triggers apply, the report says as high inflation and sovereign stress drive larger inflows into foreign stablecoins. And once that kind of dollarization takes hold, the BIS notes, it tends to persist for years. What makes the stablecoin version harder to manage is enforcement. A number of countries, particularly emerging market and developing economies, have already imposed restrictions on cross-border stablecoin use. But the BIS says such measures "are, however, likely to be imperfect given the digital bearer-like nature of tokens and the availability of unhosted wallets." In other words, capital controls that work reasonably well on traditional bank deposits don't translate cleanly to a self-custodied, borderless token. Stablecoins AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards . For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy . Latest Crypto News 1 Crypto exchange BitMEX removes CEO, CFO and head of growth 1 hour ago 2 South Korea’s $518 billion AI chip push shows crypto is still losing the capital race 2 hours ago 3 Bitcoin dips to $59,700 as Iran de-escalation lifts stocks but not crypto 2 hours ago 4 $4 billion gone. Spot bitcoin ETFs are on track for their worst month on record 4 hours ago 5 CZ wants to make the U.S. the 'capital of crypto': State of Crypto 13 hours ago 6 Samson Mow says bitcoin bottom is in despite skepticism from analysts 17 hours ago 7 Michael Saylor teases more bitcoin buying even as Strategy stock continues to fall 17 hours ago 8 SBI's $289 million Bitbank deal is symptomatic of Japan's crypto consolidation: Architect Partners 17 hours ago 9 Crypto's next frontier isn't crypto, it's financing AI and robotics, Framework's Anderson says 19 hours ago 10 Bitcoin falls below $60,000, on track for a rare back-to-back quarterly loss Jun 28, 2026 Latest Research Equities on Crypto Rails: A Platform Comparison Equities on Crypto Rails: A Platform Comparison US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale. By CoinDesk Research Jun 26, 2026 US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale. Why it matters : US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale. View Full Report More From Markets South Korea’s $518 billion AI chip push shows crypto is still losing the capital race $4 billion gone. Spot bitcoin ETFs are on track for their worst month on record Samson Mow says bitcoin bottom is in despite skepticism from analysts