Anti-trafficking group says Clarity Act's Section 604 could weaken accountability

Policy Anti-trafficking group says Clarity Act's Section 604 could weaken accountability An anti-human trafficking advocate said a Clarity Act provision could weaken accountability despite existing criminal laws. By AI Boost | Edited by Jennifer Sanasie Jun 26, 2026, 6:24 p.m. 2 min read Make preferred on Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email Make preferred on Latest developments: The Alliance to End Human Trafficking is urging lawmakers to revisit Section 604 of the Clarity Act, arguing the provision could make it harder to hold some crypto platform developers accountable when their technology is used to facilitate human trafficking. Katie Boller Gosewisch, executive director of the Alliance to End Human Trafficking, said her organization's primary concern is language stating that developers who do not control user funds are not money transmitters. Boller Gosewisch argued the provision could allow some third-party platform developers to "hide behind" a lack of liability if their software is used to facilitate trafficking-related payments. The Alliance and Catholic Charities recently sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer outlining their concerns with the legislation. Boller Gosewisch joined Rebecca Rettig and Renato Mariotti on CoinDesk's The Policy Protocol . The debate: Rettig argued Section 604 reflects longstanding U.S. anti-money laundering policy rather than creating a new legal shield. Rettig said the provision simply clarifies that developers who do not control customer assets are not considered money transmitters, consistent with existing Bank Secrecy Act and FinCEN guidance. She argued the bill preserves liability for parties that do control user funds and does not eliminate exposure under other criminal statutes. She also pointed to existing money laundering laws, including 18 U.S.C. § 1956, as tools prosecutors can use against developers who knowingly facilitate criminal activity. Reading between the lines: The disagreement centers on whether lawmakers should regulate based on current technology or potential future abuses. Boller Gosewisch said sophisticated criminals could eventually use Section 604 to create reasonable doubt in criminal prosecutions, even if that is not lawmakers' intent today. She acknowledged she is not an attorney but argued Congress should anticipate how bad actors may exploit statutory language over time. She compared the issue to civil litigation involving hotels, arguing entities may have a broader "duty of care" even if they do not directly participate in criminal conduct. What comes next: Both sides agreed stronger enforcement against human trafficking remains important, even as they disagreed on the bill's language. Boller Gosewisch said restoring a federal human trafficking coordinator and increasing financial crimes prosecutions focused on trafficking would be positive steps alongside legislative reforms. Rettig argued blockchain's transparency has become an important investigative tool for law enforcement because transactions can often be traced on public ledgers. The broader debate over developer liability continues as lawmakers consider the Clarity Act and as courts weigh cases involving developers of decentralized crypto protocols. AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards . For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy . Latest Crypto News 1 Virtuals' Jansen Teng says AI agents are evolving into autonomous economic actors 21 minutes ago 2 Securitize expects to raise $400 million as tokenization firm nears public debut 3 hours ago 3 CoinDesk 20 performance update: AAVE jumps 8.9%, leading index higher 5 hours ago 4 Wall Street's IPO revival hasn't reached dot-com euphoria levels, Goldman Sachs says 6 hours ago 5 With crypto ending the first half in the red, bitcoin's solace is it beat Strategy 6 hours ago 6 Bitcoin bounces from $58,000 as derivatives signal more pain in the pipeline 7 hours ago 7 All eyes on Strategy's June 30 ex-dividend date and monthly STRC dividend rate reset 7 hours ago 8 Binance tells EU users it will no longer provide services after failing to secure MiCA license 8 hours ago 9 Ethereum treasury firm Sharplink buys ether for the first time in eight months 8 hours ago 10 Japanese financial services giant SBI Holdings to buy Bitbank for $289 million 9 hours ago Latest Research Equities on Crypto Rails: A Platform Comparison Equities on Crypto Rails: A Platform Comparison US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale. By CoinDesk Research 8 hours ago US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale. Why it matters : US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale. View Full Report More From Policy Binance tells EU users it will no longer provide services after failing to secure MiCA license Kraken sues crypto derivatives firm PowerTrade over 'misappropriated' funds claim Post-prison CZ says time behind bars didn't hurt the billionaire's business after Binance