AI is making crypto security cheaper, faster and harder to ignore

AI is making crypto security cheaper, faster and harder to ignore

Source: CoinDesk

Published:15:00 UTC

BTC Price:$63928.8

#ai #cryptosecurity #smartcontracts

Analysis

Price Impact

Med

The article discusses ai's potential to lower the cost and increase the speed of smart contract audits, which could lead to better security for blockchain projects like ethereum. however, it also notes that ai cannot replace human judgment for social engineering or operational failures, which are often the cause of major crypto losses.

Trustworthiness

High

Price Direction

Neutral

While improved security is generally bullish for a blockchain, the article emphasizes that ai's impact is primarily on the development and auditing process rather than direct price drivers. it also highlights ai's limitations in preventing all types of hacks, leading to a neutral short-term price outlook.

Time Effect

Long

The long-term effects of ai integration into smart contract security are significant, as it could fundamentally change industry standards, developer expectations, and the cost of due diligence over time.

Original Article:

Article Content:

Tech AI is making crypto security cheaper, faster and harder to ignore As AI-powered security tools become cheaper, faster and more widely available, researchers said they could reshape what the crypto industry considers reasonable due diligence before deploying code, potentially altering expectations for developers and institutions. By Margaux Nijkerk | Edited by Nikhilesh De Jun 20, 2026, 3:00 p.m. 4 min read Make preferred on Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email Make preferred on Summary Show The launch of AI-powered security tools like Mythos could dramatically lower the cost of smart contract audits and enable continuous code reviews, potentially changing what the crypto industry considers reasonable security due diligence. While AI can help uncover coding flaws faster and more cheaply, some researchers said it cannot replace human judgment or prevent many of crypto's biggest losses, which often stem from social engineering, compromised credentials, and operational failures rather than smart contract bugs. The release of Mythos, an AI system designed to autonomously discover vulnerabilities in code , may do more than help blockchain developers find bugs. As AI-powered security tools become cheaper, faster and more widely available, researchers said they could reshape what the crypto industry considers reasonable due diligence before deploying code, potentially altering expectations for developers and institutions. For years, smart contract security has been constrained by budgets. Comprehensive audits often are costly, making AI systems like Mythos, which was briefly released earlier this month before it was removed from the American market , dramatically cheaper. "It pushes the price of a basic audit toward zero," said Alexander Urbelis, chief information security officer at ENS Labs. Work that once required weeks and significant expense could eventually be completed in minutes, allowing projects that previously could not afford professional reviews to obtain fast security assessments. For years, researchers have relied on automated tools known as fuzzers to hunt for software bugs by bombarding programs with inputs and observing what breaks. AI systems take a different approach. "It's a change in degree that could likely cause a change in kind," Urbelis said. "Machines have hunted bugs for years. But now we're talking about a fuzzer that has the capacity to reason." Rather than simply identifying technical bugs, systems like Mythos could infer what code was intended to do and compare that against what it actually does. In crypto, where smart contract code is public and bug bounties can have big budgets, that capability could significantly expand the industry's ability to identify vulnerabilities before launch. David Schwed, COO of blockchain security firm SVRN and founder of the cybersecurity master's program at Yeshiva University, described the shift as even more significant. "These models now operate the way a human attacker does," Schwed said. "They iterate, they take the next step based on what they're seeing in real time. The older tooling was just complicated deterministic flows." But Schwed argued the bigger change may not be vulnerability discovery itself. It may be the emergence of continuous security monitoring. "The real shift is continuous auditing with suggested remediations at a fraction of the cost, instead of a point-in-time review you can only afford once," he said. If security reviews become inexpensive and continuous, researchers said the industry's expectations could change alongside them. Urbelis said he believes AI could eventually reshape the standard of care around smart contract development. Historically, teams could point to the cost and complexity of audits as a reason certain reviews were not performed. That argument becomes more difficult when sophisticated security analysis is available on demand. "A clean AI report will be seen as no defense," he said. "A plaintiff may well argue it the other way: the tool existed, it was cheap, and you should have caught it." The prospect raises broader questions for the industry: if AI-powered security reviews become ubiquitous, will investors expect them before funding projects, and could failing to run AI-assisted audits eventually be viewed as negligence? Despite the technology's promise, neither researcher said he believes AI is poised to replace human auditors. While machines excel at identifying coding flaws, Urbelis said they remain weaker at spotting the economic and incentive-based vulnerabilities that have contributed to some of crypto's largest losses. "The bugs that drain treasuries often turn on intent and adversarial incentives," he said. "Those still need an experienced human in the room." Schwed offered a similar warning. "'Claude, audit my smart contract, make no mistakes' is not a security program," he said. "If the person running the tool can't evaluate what comes back, you haven't bought security, you've bought a false sense of it." But whether a system like Mythos could have prevented major hacks, both researchers noted that many of crypto's most costly incidents did not originate from smart contract vulnerabilities. Urbelis pointed to the recent compromise of Drift, which he described as the culmination of a months-long social engineering campaign that targeted trusted contributors rather than the protocol's code. "The smart contract did exactly what it was told," he said. "The authority behind the instruction was what was compromised and abused." Similarly, Schwed cited incidents such as Ronin and Bybit , where compromised keys and manipulated signing processes, rather than software vulnerabilities, played central roles. "No code scanner stops an authorized signer from approving a transaction they can't verify," he said. That reality suggests AI will not eliminate crypto's security challenges. But the researchers argued it could fundamentally alter one part of the equation: the cost of finding bugs and the expectations surrounding their discovery. Read more: How Anthropic’s Mythos model is forcing the crypto industry to rethink everything about security Ethereum News Artificial Intelligence Hack Latest Crypto News 1 How STRC lost its par: The timeline behind Strategy's preferred-stock meltdown 2 hours ago 2 Schwab to join prediction markets race with S&P 500 event-based options: WSJ 21 hours ago 3 GoMining challenges Jack Dorsey's Square with payments system designed around bitcoin Jun 19, 2026 4 Franklin Templeton proposes new ETFs that turn corporate dividends into bitcoin Jun 19, 2026 5 Smart-contract and DeFi coins lead losses as bitcoin wilts for 4th straight day Jun 19, 2026 6 Digital credit market hit by huge selloff as Strive CEO blames leverage liquidations Jun 19, 2026 7 Microsoft found malware that hijacks crypto wallets and spreads through USB sticks Jun 19, 2026 8 XRP falls 3% after losing $1.15 support as breakout attempt fades Jun 19, 2026 9 Live markets: Bitcoin under pressure as Saylor comments on STRC selloff Jun 19, 2026 10 Bitcoin traders load up on bearish bets all the way down to $52,000 Jun 19, 2026 Latest Research CEX Volumes Drop to Lowest Since September 2024 as RWA Perps Hit Record High CEX Volumes Drop to Lowest Since September 2024 as RWA Perps Hit Record High In May, combined exchange volumes fell 3.45% to $4.41T; the lowest since September 2024. RWA perpetual futures volumes rose 10.4% against the trend, hitting a new all-time high. By CoinDesk Research Jun 15, 2026 In May, combined exchange volumes fell 3.45% to $4.41T; the lowest since September 2024. RWA perpetual futures volumes rose 10.4% against the trend, hitting a new all-time high. Why it matters : In May, combined exchange volumes fell 3.45% to $4.41T; the lowest since September 2024. RWA perpetual futures volumes rose 10.4% against the trend, hitting a new all-time high. View Full Report More From Tech Microsoft found malware that hijacks crypto wallets and spreads through USB sticks Ethereum Foundation loses another key leader as co-executive director Hsiao-Wei Wang resigns Algorand unveils roadmap to achieve quantum resistance by 2028