Sports betting should be regulated as a financial product, not gambling, aspiring prediction market provider says

Policy Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email Sports betting should be regulated as a financial product, not gambling, aspiring prediction market provider says Novig CEO Jacob Fortinsky said his company will transition to a federal Designated Contract Market framework this summer to launch in all 50 states, while 57 Maiden's Adam Mastrelli said he was banned from two major sportsbooks within two months for being “sharp." By Jeffrey Albus | Edited by Nikhilesh De May 9, 2026, 5:00 p.m. 2 min read Make preferred on Shayon Sengupta, Adam Mastrelli and Jacob Fortinsky (CoinDesk) What to know : Novig's CEO said it will transition this summer from a 35-state sweepstakes product to a federal Designated Contract Market (DCM) framework, going live in all 50 states. 57 Maiden’s co-founders were banned from two major sportsbooks within two months for being "sharps," driving them to prediction markets like Novig. Fortinsky believes the federal-state legal fight over sports event contracts is likely to reach the Supreme Court in two to three years. MIAMI BEACH, Fla. — Sports betting should be regulated as a federal financial product rather than a state-licensed casino product, two panelists said Thursday. Appearing at Consensus Miami 2026, Jacob Fortinsky, co-founder and CEO of sports betting platform Novig, said the legacy sportsbook model is structurally broken because it treats winning bettors as cheaters. "Sports betting is really the only industry in the country that regularly limits and bans their power users," Fortinsky said. He framed sports event contracts as binary financial instruments that "for so long have been treated as a gambling product and instead should really be treated as a financial product." Globally, he said, sports betting is "a $2 trillion asset class still dominated by these legacy casinos." Adam Mastrelli, founder of 57 Maiden, a firm that builds AI-driven trading strategies for prediction markets, validated the critique with personal experience. "My partner and I got kicked off of two big sportsbooks within two months of trading because we were sharp," he said, It's like "LeBron James getting kicked out of the NBA for being too good," he added. Mastrelli said the team turned to Novig, which he said charges no fees and allows traders to create synthetic positions. Mastrelli said his firm's edge decayed quickly, and of 154 proposed trading strategies, only three currently run profitably. "This edge will go away," he said, "so if you can build systems that can keep up with that edge and that alpha… then it becomes really, really intriguing." His most profitable season, he said, was the WNBA. Fortinsky said Novig is on track to transition this summer from a sweepstakes model live in 35 states to a federal DCM framework that will let it operate in all 50 states. An earlier attempt to be regulated at the state level in Colorado, he said, was a wake-up call. "Regulators told us essentially you're naive if you think we care about consumer protection or innovation or market efficiency. We really just care about our tax revenue," he said. The federal-state fight, Fortinsky added, is "going to get to the Supreme Court in the next two or three years," with 15 pending lawsuits between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Kalshi, Robinhood and various states. Within prediction markets, he argued sports is "counterintuitively actually the safest vertical," given the bigger insider-trading and manipulation concerns around political and event-driven contracts. Mastrelli, who said he avoids offshore platforms entirely, compared prediction markets to equities exchanges: "When I see a robust equities market now, this is AQR against SIG. It doesn't go away." Consensus Miami 2026 More For You Crypto industry cheers Senate Clarity Act markup date as market structure push resumes By Francisco Rodrigues | Edited by Nikhilesh De 1 hour ago The bill's progress follows talks on jurisdiction, consumer/developer protections, and stablecoin rewards, with crypto firms backing a yield compromise. What to know : The Senate Banking Committee will meet on May 14 to consider the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, a crypto market structure bill. The bill's progress follows talks on jurisdiction, consumer/developer protections and stablecoin rewards, with crypto firms backing a yield compromise. Crypto industry leaders cheered the markup, viewing... Read full story Latest Crypto News It might be too late for bitcoin’s quantum migration, Project Eleven report argues 1 hour ago Crypto industry cheers Senate Clarity Act markup date as market structure push resumes 1 hour ago Emerging-market users are treating crypto exchanges like banking apps, Binance says 1 hour ago Swiss central bank bitcoin reserve push fails over signature shortfall 1 hour ago CME is set to let traders bet on bitcoin volatility, not just price 1 hour ago How DeFi is changing the financial landscape for Latin Americans 2 hours ago Top Stories LayerZero says it ‘made a mistake’ in $292 Million Kelp exploit 3 hours ago BlackRock deepens tokenization push with new onchain fund offerings 3 hours ago Senate Banking Committee plans to hold key market structure hearing on Thursday 17 hours ago Judge clears path for Aave to move $71 million in ETH linked to North Korea hack 12 hours ago SEC chair Atkins signals new rules for onchain markets, AI-driven finance 22 hours ago Kraken parent goes for the OCC charter in bid to become a federal crypto bank May 8, 2026