Bitcoin's quantum debate splits as Adam Back pushes optional upgrades over forced freeze

Tech Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email Bitcoin's quantum debate splits as Adam Back pushes optional upgrades over forced freeze The Blockstream CEO told Paris Blockchain Week that Bitcoin should build quantum-resistant upgrades now, a day after Jameson Lopp proposed freezing vulnerable coins instead. By Shaurya Malwa | Edited by Omkar Godbole Apr 16, 2026, 5:51 a.m. Make preferred on What to know : Bitcoin developer Adam Back argues that the network should begin adding optional quantum-resistant features now, even though practical quantum computers remain years away. A new proposal known as BIP-361 would phase out quantum-vulnerable addresses over five years and freeze coins that do not migrate, including Satoshi Nakamoto’s and millions of long-dormant bitcoins. The debate centers on whether Bitcoin should rely on rapid, emergency coordination if quantum threats materialize or pre-schedule strict measures like address freezes to force an orderly migration. The quantum computing threat has some of Bitcoin's most vocal developers landing in wildly different places. Blockstream's CEO, Adam Back, told Paris Blockchain Week attendees on Wednesday that Bitcoin developers should start building optional quantum-resistant upgrades now, even though current quantum computers remain "essentially lab experiments" with progress that has been "incremental" over the 25 years he has tracked the field. "Preparation is key. Making changes in a controlled way is far safer than reacting in a crisis," the Blockstream CEO said. He pointed to his company's work testing quantum-resistant transaction signatures on Liquid, a sister network to Bitcoin. He argued that a 2021 Bitcoin upgrade called Taproot was designed flexibly enough to accept new signature methods without disrupting anyone currently using the network. The comments echo Back's position from last week, when he told CoinDesk that users should have roughly a decade to migrate their keys to quantum-resistant formats. What is different now is the context around them. BIP-361, the proposal from Jameson Lopp and five other developers published Tuesday , would phase out quantum-vulnerable addresses on a fixed five-year timeline and freeze any coins that fail to migrate. That includes roughly 1 million bitcoin attributed to Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, and an estimated 5.6 million coins, Loppsays, have not moved in over a decade. Back's framing reads as the implicit alternative to BIP-361's forced migration. He did not mention the Lopp proposal directly, but addressed the underlying question of whether Bitcoin's developer community can respond quickly to a sudden quantum breakthrough. "Bugs have been identified and fixed within hours. When something becomes urgent, it focuses attention and drives consensus," he said, suggesting Bitcoin's rough-consensus governance could handle an emergency without pre-scheduled freezes years in advance. The two positions represent the core disagreement shaping Bitcoin's quantum debate . Back is betting that developers can coordinate quickly if the threat accelerates. Lopp is betting they cannot, and that a scheduled freeze is the only way to avoid a disorderly migration under pressure. Google and Caltech researchers said last month that functional quantum computers capable of breaking Bitcoin's cryptography could arrive sooner than previously estimated, which is what moved the debate from theoretical to active. quantum computing More For You Bitcoin devs bet a quantum attacker will play nice with a ‘wait and react’ plan By Sam Reynolds | Edited by Omkar Godbole 1 hour ago BitMEX Research proposes a canary system that pays a bounty to the first quantum attacker and activates a network-wide freeze, offering an alternative to a fixed five-year timeline. What to know : Bitcoin developers are weighing a BitMEX Research proposal for a "canary" system that would only restrict vulnerable older wallets if a quantum-capable attacker proves the threat on-chain. The canary address would hold a bounty that only a quantum attacker could unlock, with any spend both triggering a retroactive freeze on... Read full story Latest Crypto News Bitcoin rally is taking a breather near $75,000. Onchain data shows why 8 minutes ago Dogecoin jumps 4.5% to nearly 10-cents, outperforming bitcoin and ether 19 minutes ago Ripple partners with Korea's Kyobo Life to tokenize government bond settlement 49 minutes ago Bitcoin steady as S&P 500 hits record, but options market isn't buying the peace trade 1 hour ago Bitcoin devs bet a quantum attacker will play nice with a ‘wait and react’ plan 1 hour ago Solana Policy Institute-backed PAC spends millions to jam Sherrod Brown's Senate run 6 hours ago Top Stories Bitcoin capped at $75,000 as Nasdaq and S&P 500 fly to new record highs 6 hours ago Tether adds $70 million in bitcoin to reserves, bringing holdings above 97,000 BTC 10 hours ago Why Morgan Stanley's CFO sees tokenization as the next big step for its multi-trillion wealth business 14 hours ago Justin Sun blasts Trump-linked WLFI's 'absurd' governance vote, escalating feud 7 hours ago Crypto's new $11 million PAC booked millions in ads with firm started by Tether US CEO 10 hours ago Bitcoin developer Jameson Lopp says it's better to freeze 5.6 million BTC than let hackers have them 14 hours ago