Crypto News Aggregators to Lose 60% of Revenue on X: Crypto Community Celebrates

Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available. Why impose sanctions? Upside for beginners Advertisement The community’s response to X’s tightening of the screws on cryptocurrency news aggregators is mainly positive. According to Nikita Bier, aggregator accounts’ payouts have already been lowered to 60% for the current cycle, and a further 20% deduction is scheduled for the following cycle . Why impose sanctions? The logic is simple: original creators have been displaced by low-effort, high-volume reposting, which has lowered the standard of content on the platform. Bier claims that incentives, rather than speech, are the issue. The monetization system has been manipulated by accounts that flood timelines with recycled headlines, frequently encapsulated in “BREAKING” tags. As a result, engagement is fueled more by volume and repetition than by originality or insight, creating a distorted ecosystem. This is good for this platform. Everyone is tired of all the "BREAKING" posts. So many accounts just regurgitate 100 different news headlines each day and put "BREAKING" in front of the headline. It truly is exhausting. This will give smaller accounts a better chance https://t.co/Iwgd10hrRD HOT Stories Ripple Vet Questions NYT Reporter's Satoshi Hunt Proof Midnight (NIGHT) Open Interest 100% Spike Could Be Followed, Ethereum's (ETH) Only Possibility to Reach $3,000, XRP to Face Crucial Resistance Next Week: Crypto Market Review — Benjamin Cowen (@benjamincowen) April 12, 2026 X’s reaction is to go straight after that behavior’s economic component. In cryptocurrency, this is more important than in most other niches. Information overload is already a problem in the area, with dozens of accounts posting the same updates minutes apart. Instead of unique information, traders and investors are receiving noise. X is essentially compelling these accounts to change or become obsolete by reducing payouts. Advertisement You Might Also Like Sun, 04/12/2026 - 07:46 Schiff: Bitcoin Is Tanking By Alex Dovbnya The response from Benjamin Cowen is indicative of a more general attitude. He noted how tiresome it has become to scroll through countless “BREAKING” posts that are worthless, and referred to the change as good for the platform . His reasoning makes sense: timelines should inevitably shift in favor of fewer, better voices if the incentive to spam vanishes. Upside for beginners There is also a second-order effect here. Smaller accounts may finally receive greater visibility , particularly those of analysts and independent researchers. Original content has a greater chance of appearing when aggregator spam no longer dominates algorithmic reach. That could enhance market comprehension and discourse quality, especially in an industry where subtlety is crucial. Advertisement But there are risks associated with this change. By rapidly distributing and filtering data, some aggregators do add value. If the cuts are too drastic, the platform may lose both spam and effective information pipelines. The path is still obvious. X is changing its definition of rewards. That alters the game in cryptocurrency, where attention is money. #Shiba Inu #Shiba Inu (SHIB) Price Prediction