Quantum-safe bitcoin now possible without a soft fork, but costs $200 a pop, new research shows

Markets Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email Quantum-safe bitcoin now possible without a soft fork, but costs $200 a pop, new research shows A new scheme from a StarkWare researcher works under existing consensus rules, offering an emergency fallback while BIP-360 awaits activation. By Sam Reynolds | Edited by Omkar Godbole Apr 10, 2026, 3:54 a.m. Make preferred on (Unsplash) What to know : A StarkWare researcher has proposed Quantum Safe Bitcoin, a hash-based scheme that can make bitcoin transactions resistant to quantum attacks today without changing the Bitcoin protocol. The method works within existing consensus rules but requires massive off-chain GPU computation, driving estimated costs to $75 to $200 per transaction and making it far more complex than standard payments. Framed as a last-resort emergency tool rather than a permanent fix, QSB contrasts with long-term proposals like BIP-360, which seek protocol-level quantum resistance but are likely years away from activation. A StarkWare researcher has published what he says is the first method for making bitcoin transactions quantum-safe on the live network today, without any changes to the Bitcoin protocol. The scheme, however, costs up to $200 per transaction and is designed as an emergency measure rather than a permanent fix. In a paper published this week , StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy introduced Quantum Safe Bitcoin, or QSB, a scheme that aims to enable quantum-resistant transactions without requiring changes to the Bitcoin protocol, by replacing signature-based security assumptions with hash-based proofs within its design. The hash-based design survives the kind of quantum attack that would break today’s cryptography, but shifts the burden from consensus to computation, requiring heavy off-chain GPU work for every transaction. Think of traditional digital signatures as a handwritten signature on a cheque, which proves you authorized a transaction using a secret key that others can cross check with a public key. In Bitcoin, these digital signatures are called ECDSA signatures. They are secure against today’s computers, but a sufficiently powerful future quantum computer could, in theory, derive the secret key from a public key and potentially compromise funds. QSB addresses that flaw by redesigning the system around a different kind of cryptography, involving hash-based proofs, which are more like a tamper-proof fingerprint, where instead of relying on signature alone, a unique mathematical digest of data is created. This is said to be extremely difficult to forge or reverse, even for powerful computers. QSB works entirely within Bitcoin's existing consensus rules for legacy transactions. It requires no soft fork (software upgrade), no miner signaling, and no activation timeline. This is a sharp contrast to BIP-360 , the quantum-resistance proposal that was merged into Bitcoin's official improvement proposal repository in February but has no Bitcoin Core implementation and faces years of governance delay. The proposal builds on an earlier idea known as Binohash , which added an extra layer of computational work to secure bitcoin transactions. The problem is that it depends on a type of cryptography that quantum computers are expected to break. In practice, that means the protection disappears in a quantum scenario. An attacker could bypass the system’s core security check entirely, making it ineffective. Extra cost The hash-based solution, however, means extremely expensive transactions. Generating a valid transaction requires searching through billions of possible candidates, a process Levy estimates would cost between $75 and $200 using commodity cloud GPUs. Currently, the cost to send a bitcoin transaction through the blockchain is around 33 cents . The system also comes with practical hurdles. QSB transactions wouldn’t move through Bitcoin’s normal blockchain like typical payments. Instead, users would likely need to send them directly to miners willing to process them. They also don’t work with faster, cheaper layers like the Lightning Network, and are far more complicated to create. Generating a transaction would require outsourcing heavy computation to external hardware, rather than simply signing and sending from a wallet. Levy describes the scheme as a “last resort measure,” not a replacement for protocol-level upgrades. Proposals such as BIP-360, which aim to introduce quantum-resistant signature schemes through a soft fork, remain the more scalable long-term solution but could take years to activate. BIP-360's activation timeline is uncertain. Polymarket bettors are pricing in low odds of it happening this year, and Bitcoin's governance history offers little reason for urgency — Taproot took roughly seven and a half years from concept to deployment. Then again, mature quantum computers capable of breaking the encryption that secures the network are not arriving tomorrow either. QSB instead offers something different: a way to survive a quantum break using today’s rules, if users are willing to pay for it. quantum computing More For You Encryption Supremacy: Zcash and Privacy in the Age of Scale By CoinDesk Research Mar 31, 2026 Commissioned by GenZcash Most crypto privacy models weaken as blockchain data grows. Encryption-based models like Zcash strengthen. CoinDesk Research maps the five privacy approaches and examines the widening gap. Why it matters : As blockchain adoption scales, the metadata available to machine learning models scales with it. Obfuscation-based privacy approaches are structurally degrading as a result. This report provides a comprehensive comparison of all five major crypto privacy architectures and a framework for evaluating which models remain durable as AI capabilities improve. View Full Report More For You OKX and HashKey invest in new Vietnam exchange ahead of crypto licensing push By Sam Reynolds , AI Boost 1 hour ago The partnership will help the exchange meet Vietnam's $380 million capital requirement to enter a government pilot program aimed at licensing local platforms and curbing offshore trading. What to know : OKX Ventures and HashKey Capital are investing in Vietnam Prosperity Crypto Asset Exchange (CAEX), positioning it as a key player in Vietnam's emerging regulated crypto market. The funding lifts CAEX's capital base to about $380 million, meeting the threshold to join a government pilot program for licensed crypto trading under... Read full story Latest Crypto News OKX and HashKey invest in new Vietnam exchange ahead of crypto licensing push 1 hour ago Mythos AI threat prompts Bessent, Powell to convene bank CEOs for urgent talks 1 hour ago Bitcoin tops $72,000, but Circle and Bullish drop sharply after downgrades 6 hours ago These 3 crypto stocks could actually beat bitcoin ETFs, says TD Cowen 7 hours ago Kalshi now controls 89% of the U.S. prediction market as regulated trading takes over 9 hours ago Securitize names ex-SEC official Brett Redfearn as president ahead of public listing 10 hours ago Top Stories Potential buyers are circling Winklevoss-backed crypto exchange Gemini 10 hours ago Bitcoin shoots above $72,000 as optimism grows over Middle East ceasefire 11 hours ago Trump's World Liberty Financial borrowed millions from a protocol its own advisor co-founded 13 hours ago Mike Novogratz spotlights Helios as $15 billion powerhouse in Galaxy Digital annual report 14 hours ago U.S. Treasury to loop in crypto sector on hacker warnings shared with traditional firms 10 hours ago Tom Lee's Bitmine uplists to NYSE, expands buyback authorization to $4 billion 13 hours ago