U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Trump's tariffs may not rock crypto — yet

News Analysis Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Trump's tariffs may not rock crypto — yet The more significant result from the U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of President Donald Trump's trade tariffs may be political, which could sting the industry. By Jesse Hamilton | Edited by Aoyon Ashraf Feb 20, 2026, 6:42 p.m. Make us preferred on Google The U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of President Donald Trump's tariff could have longterm political implications affecting crypto policy. (Jesse Hamilton/CoinDesk) What to know : The Supreme Court's rebuke on tariffs has so far made few waves in the crypto sector, though it adds to the running economic dispute that's occupying some political bandwidth in Washington. If it becomes a live debate in the Senate, that could cost crypto advocates some of the Senate floor time they'd need for a crypto market structure bill. And if the tariff fight has political implications in the midterm congressional elections, it could help Democrats gain more traction in Congress — and more influence over crypto policy. The U.S. Supreme Court has decided that President Donald Trump didn't have the power to impose tariffs as he did. While the markets have taken the decision in stride, the impact on crypto is likely to be modest — at least for now — as there are political considerations that may influence the industry's policy trajectory in Washington. Though Trump's aggressive and sometimes turbulent pursuit of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act is halted, the president has a number of other options to replace them with tariffs available in other legal authorities governing U.S. trade. He said in a Friday press conference after the "deeply disappointing" decision that "there are methods, practices, statutes and authorities, as recognized by the entire court in this terrible decision ... that are even stronger than the IEEPA tariffs available to me as president of the United States." "Other alternatives will now be used to replace the ones that the court incorrectly rejected," Trump said. In the near term, anything that occupies policymakers in the coming weeks could threaten to steal some of the oxygen from the already dicey U.S. Senate timeline to get the crypto industry's top goal accomplished: passage of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act that would govern U.S. crypto market structure. Senator Bernie Moreno, an Ohio Republican, staunch Trump supporter and a big crypto advocate, posted on social media site X , "SCOTUS’s outrageous ruling handcuffs our fight against unfair trade that has devastated American workers for decades." On the other side of the aisle, Senator Elizabeth Warren, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, celebrated the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling but suggested it left intact the harm already imposed on consumers. Earlier this month, the Tax Foundation reported an estimated per-household hit of $1,000 last year and $1,300 this year from the tariffs. “The court has struck down these destructive tariffs, but there is no legal mechanism for consumers and many small businesses to recoup the money they have already paid,” U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren said in a statement. “Instead, giant corporations with their armies of lawyers and lobbyists can sue for tariff refunds, then just pocket the money for themselves. It’s one more example of how the game is rigged.” The Cato Institute, however, is holding out hope for refunds of the "tens of billions" in customs duties collected under the tariffs. "That refund process could be easy, but it appears more likely that more litigation and paperwork will be required — a particularly unfair burden for smaller importers that lack the resources to litigate tariff refund claims yet never did anything wrong," according to a Friday statement from economists at the libertarian think tank. The crypto bill impact Despite the legal resolution, the tariff dispute and its aftermath will likely be front-and-center in this year's midterm congressional elections, and those races could have a profound effect on the crypto sector. If Congress hasn't yet passed a market structure bill by this summer, the industry's policy efforts will depend on the outcome of those elections, especially if they shift the majority in the House of Representatives or in both chambers of Congress. And even if the crypto industry already has the Clarity Act in hand by then, there are a number of other legislative initiatives at play on taxation and bitcoin BTC $ 67,789.26 reserves. The Supreme Court's rebuke of Trump's illegal tariff regime could provide some boost to Democratic candidates in otherwise close races. Democrat candidates will seek to convince voters that they've been personally harmed by the tariffs, as Warren argued. If enough Democrats win to secure the House majority, they could make it much more difficult for the current crypto policy push to advance without heavy revisions that could impose more constraints on the sector. Read More: Bitcoin pops then drops as Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs tariff U.S. Supreme Court Donald Trump Market Structure Legislation More For You Zoomex: Precise Systems of Fairness and Transparency by Design By CoinDesk Jan 31, 2026 Commissioned by Zoomex Read full story More For You U.S. government isn't poised to sweep in with bitcoin buys, despite Jim Cramer rumor By Jesse Hamilton | Edited by Sheldon Reback Feb 9, 2026 President Donald Trump did order a bitcoin reserve, but it doesn't yet exist, even as the CNBC host says the feds will start filling it when bitcoin hits $60,000. What to know : The recent drama over bitcoin's slide was made more puzzling over the weekend as the markets sought to figure out a rumor shared by CNBC's Jim Cramer that President Donald Trump would start filling his bitcoin reserve if the asset drops to $60,000. The situation with the reserve, though, is that it hasn't been established, and it probably needs congressional action to do so. Trump administration officials have said the government isn't planning on spending taxpayer funds to buy crypto, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week that he has no authority to bail out bitcoin. Read full story Latest Crypto News Dubai takes next step to make real estate flips instant in $16 billion tokenization plan 1 hour ago RWA issuers prioritize capital formation over liquidity, according to Brickken survey 2 hours ago Bitcoin pops then drops as Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs 3 hours ago Goldman Sachs, Franklin Templeton, and Nicki Minaj: Inside Trump’s surreal Mar-a-Lago crypto summit 3 hours ago CoinDesk 20 performance update: AAVE falls 3.3%, leading index lower 4 hours ago What next for XRP as volatility sinks to 2024 lows 5 hours ago Top Stories Bitcoin logs worst first 50-day start to a year on record 12 hours ago Ripple's Brad Garlinghouse says CLARITY bill has '90% chance' of passing by April 11 hours ago Dual South Korean listings send Ethereum layer-2 token AZTEC surging 82% 7 hours ago Inside the meeting: White House favors some stablecoin rewards, tells banks it's time to move 20 hours ago Bitcoin difficulty jumps 15% largest increase since 2021, despite price slump 12 hours ago Metaplanet CEO rebuts critics over bitcoin strategy and transparency 13 hours ago In this article BTC BTC $ 67,832.96 ◢ 1.17 %