The establishment of the dao security fund, utilizing a ~$150 million endowment derived from untouched eth to bolster ethereum security, is a significant positive development. while not an immediate price driver, it addresses fundamental long-term concerns about network integrity and robustness, fostering greater confidence.
The news comes from coindesk, a reputable crypto news source, detailing a clear initiative led by original dao curators with a well-defined plan for securing the ethereum ecosystem. the reported figures and motivations are transparent.
Dedicating substantial resources to ethereum security is a strong bullish signal. it enhances the network's resilience against exploits, which is crucial for its adoption as 'the financial backbone of the world.' improved security reduces risk perception and attracts more users and developers.
The impact of enhanced security measures and ongoing funding for security research and tooling will manifest over the long term. it's a foundational improvement that builds trust and stability gradually, rather than causing an immediate price surge.
Tech Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email From 2016 hack to $150M Endowment: the DAO’s second act focuses on Ethereum security Ten years after the famous hack, the DAO Security Fund has decided to stake the untouched ETH and use the yield to fund Ethereum security initiatives, honor claims indefinitely, and professionalize governance and key management. By Margaux Nijkerk , AI Boost | Edited by Stephen Alpher Feb 18, 2026, 1:00 p.m. Make us preferred on Google What to know : In the summer of 2016, the Decentralized Autonomous Organization, known as the DAO, became the defining crisis of Ethereum’s early years. Now, nearly a decade later, that story has taken an unexpected turn. What was lost, or rather, left untouched, is being repurposed as a ~$150 million (at today’s prices) security endowment for the Ethereum ecosystem. The fund will distribute capital through decentralized mechanisms such as quadratic funding, retroactive public goods funding, and ranked-choice voting for proposals. In the summer of 2016, the Decentralized Autonomous Organization, known as the DAO, became the defining crisis of Ethereum’s early years. A smart c ontract exploit siphoned millions of dollars’ worth of ether (ETH) from that initial project, and the community’s response — a contentious hard fork to recover those funds, splintered the original chain from the current one, leaving the old chain behind, known as Ethereum Classic. The DAO was once the largest crowdfunding effort in crypto’s history, but faded into a cautionary tale of governance, security, and the limits of “code is law.” STORY CONTINUES BELOW Don't miss another story. Subscribe to the The Protocol Newsletter today . See all newsletters Sign me up By signing up, you will receive emails about CoinDesk products and you agree to our terms & conditions and privacy policy . Now, nearly a decade later, that story has taken an unexpected turn . What was lost, or rather, left untouched, is being repurposed as a ~$150 million (at today’s prices) security endowment for the Ethereum ecosystem. The endowment, known now as the DAO Security Fund, will stake some of the 75,000 dormant ether (ETH) and deploy the yield through community-driven funding rounds to support Ethereum security research, tooling and rapid-response efforts, while keeping claims open for any remaining eligible token holders. At the center of this story is Griff Green, one of the original DAO curators and a veteran of Ethereum decentralized governance. “When the DAO hack happened [in 2016], obviously, I jumped into action and basically led everything but the hard fork,” Green said of assembling the white hat group that rescued funds on the original Ethereum chain. “We hacked all these hackers. It was straight up DAO wars”. That effort, alongside others, helped salvage funds that might otherwise have been lost forever. At the time, the hard fork restored roughly 97% of the DAO’s funds to token holders, but left a small fraction, roughly 3%, in limbo. These “edge case” funds came from quirks of the original smart contracts: people who paid more than expected, those who burned tokens to form sub-DAOs, and other anomalies that didn’t cleanly map back. Over time, that leftover balance, once only worth a few million, ballooned into something far more significant due to ether’s [ETH] appreciation. “The value of the funds we control has grown dramatically… well over 75,000 ETH,” a blog post for the new DAO fund states. Green and his fellow curators have spent the last decade quietly helping people recover funds and managing these residual balances. But as he tells it, the landscape has shifted. “Six volunteers were securing $300 million with decade keys. It didn’t make sense,” he told CoinDesk in an interview. “With all these AI hacks and stuff, we just got kind of scared.” Their old security model simply is no longer fit to guard nine-figure sums, Green shared. Rather than let these funds sit idle in perpetuity, the team has decided to stake the ETH and use the yield to fund Ethereum security initiatives, honor claims indefinitely, and professionalize governance and key management. “We can stake these funds, keep claims open forever, and use the staking rewards to fund Ethereum security projects,” Green explained. The fund will distribute capital through decentralized mechanisms such as quadratic funding, retroactive public goods funding, and ranked-choice voting for proposals. 'Financial backbone of the world' For Green, the revival is also personal. The DAO hack was Ethereum’s first existential test, exposing how experimental the ecosystem still was. Nearly a decade later, he argues, the industry remains vulnerable in different ways. “MetaMask, hot wallet keys, just any kind of private keys on your daily driver computer is probably the main fuel for a whole cyber crime industry,” Green said. “The fact that we have hot keys with billions of dollars sitting on like 10,000 laptops spread out throughout the world has an industry of cybercrime.” The persistence of hacks, phishing schemes and smart contract exploits frustrates him. “Not only amazes me, it disappoints me and frustrates me,” he said, describing the state of Ethereum security today. That urgency is shaping how the new fund will operate. Unlike the Ethereum Foundation’s more top-down grantmaking process, the DAO Security Fund is designed as a bottom-up experiment, allowing participants in the DAO to decide how to distribute funds. Round operators will apply to distribute funds, security experts will help set eligibility standards, and staking rewards will provide a renewable pool of capital. If Ethereum is to become what many believe it is, the core infrastructure for global finance, Green says security must come first. “Ethereum is at the cusp of being the financial backbone of the world, if it fixes security,” he said. The DAO Security Fund, in Green’s view, is therefore both a continuation of unfinished work and a forward-looking vehicle for safeguarding Ethereum as it scales. Read more: Ethereum OGs revive the DAO with $220 million security fund, Unchained reports Ethereum News AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards . For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy . More For You Zoomex: Precise Systems of Fairness and Transparency by Design By CoinDesk Jan 31, 2026 Commissioned by Zoomex Read full story More For You Moonwell's $1.12 nightmare: A pricing glitch just let bots seize millions in ETH collateral By Shaurya Malwa | Edited by Jamie Crawley 1 hour ago A misconfigured Chainlink price oracle on DeFi lender Moonwell briefly valued Coinbase Wrapped ETH (cbETH) at about $1 instead of roughly $2,200. What to know : A misconfigured Chainlink price oracle on DeFi lender Moonwell briefly valued Coinbase Wrapped ETH (cbETH) at about $1 instead of roughly $2,200, leaving the protocol with nearly $1.8 million in bad debt. The error, triggered by a governance-approved oracle change that used only the cbETH-to-ETH ratio, allowed liquidation bots to seize 1,096.317 cbETH as if it were nearly worthless and enabled some users to borrow cheaply against minimal collateral. Moonwell quickly cut supply and borrow caps but could not immediately correct the oracle due to a required governance vote and five-day timelock, underscoring how critical and fragile price oracles are for DeFi applications. Read full story Latest Crypto News While some big investors cash out of crypto, others double down 28 minutes ago Milo tops $100 million in crypto-backed mortgages, closes record $12 million deal 1 hour ago Bitcoin holds near $68,000 as volatility cools, WLFI jumps ahead of Mar-a-Lago forum 1 hour ago Moonwell's $1.12 nightmare: A pricing glitch just let bots seize millions in ETH collateral 1 hour ago Brevan Howard's crypto fund said to lose 30% in worst year since inception: FT 2 hours ago Zora moves onto Solana with 'attention markets' for trading internet trends 5 hours ago Top Stories Bitcoin ETFs hold billions despite price crash, but resilience masks harsh reality 6 hours ago Peter Thiel's Founders Fund dumps every ETHZilla share 6 hours ago Bitcoin losing $70,000 is a warning sign for further downside 5 hours ago CFTC's Selig opens legal dispute against states getting in way of prediction markets 21 hours ago Crypto infrastructure firm BitGo a potential acquisition target for Wall Street firms, analysts say 20 hours ago