Vitalik buterin's comments signify a fundamental shift in ethereum's scaling roadmap, emphasizing layer 1's direct scaling capabilities and challenging the original rollup-centric vision for layer 2s. this redefines the value proposition and future development path for the entire ecosystem.
As the co-founder of ethereum, vitalik buterin's statements are authoritative and directly influence the network's strategic direction and developer consensus.
Buterin's assertion that ethereum layer 1 is scaling directly with low fees and increasing gas limits is a strong bullish signal for eth, highlighting the mainnet's growing efficiency and robustness. this reassessment may pressure some layer 2s to redefine their value beyond basic scaling, but fundamentally strengthens the ethereum ecosystem as a whole.
This is a strategic re-assessment of ethereum's long-term scaling philosophy and the role of its ecosystem components. the implications for l1 development, l2 adaptation, and investor perception will unfold over an extended period.
Finance Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email 'You are not scaling Ethereum': Vitalik Buterin issues a blunt reality check to the biggest crypto networks The roadmap in place doesn't make as much sense because progress among layer-2s toward later stages of decentralization has been slower and more difficult, and Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on layer-1. By Margaux Nijkerk , AI Boost | Edited by Aoyon Ashraf Feb 3, 2026, 5:19 p.m. Make us preferred on Google What to know : Vitalik Buterin said the original rollup-centric roadmap, which positioned layer-2s as the primary way Ethereum would scale, “no longer makes sense.” This is because, first, progress among layer-2s toward later stages of decentralization has been slower and more difficult than expected. Secondly, he argues, Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on layer-1, with fees remaining low and gas limits expected to increase significantly in 2026. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said the role of layer-2 networks needs to be reconsidered as Ethereum’s main network continues to scale and transaction costs remain low. In a post on X , Buterin said the original rollup-centric roadmap, which positioned layer-2s as the primary way Ethereum would scale, “no longer makes sense.” That roadmap envisioned layer-2s as secure extensions of Ethereum that would handle most transactions while inheriting Ethereum’s security guarantees, often described as “branded shards” of the network. STORY CONTINUES BELOW Don't miss another story. Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today . See all newsletters Sign me up By signing up, you will receive emails about CoinDesk products and you agree to our terms & conditions and privacy policy . Layer 2s, such as Arbitrum, Optimism and Base, are offchain networks built on top of primary blockchains (Layer 1s) like Ethereum. The main purpose of these is to increase transaction speed and reduce transaction costs on the main network. Think of Ethereum’s main network as a packed main hall at a conference. Space is limited, so getting in can be slow and expensive. Layer-2 networks act like overflow rooms, letting people participate and interact without crowding the main hall, while still staying connected to what’s happening there. 'You are not scaling Ethereum' According to Buterin, two developments have challenged that original vision for Layer 2 networks. First, progress among layer-2s toward l ater stages of decentralization has been slower and more difficult than expected. Second, Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on layer-1, with fees remaining low and gas limits expected to increase significantly in 2026. Buterin wrote that scaling Ethereum should mean creating “large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum,” where activity is “guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions.” He argued that high-throughput chains connected to Ethereum through multisig-controlled bridges do not meet that definition. “If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum,” he wrote. In his view, Ethereum no longer needs layer-2s to function as "branded shards" for the network. This means that, because Ethereum itself is scaling, layer-2 networks are no longer required to function as official extensions of Ethereum. He also noted that many layer-2s are “not able or willing” to meet the decentralization and security standards required by the model. Buterin also noted that some layer-2s may intentionally choose not to move beyond “stage 1,” including for regulatory reasons. In one example, he wrote that a project argued it may never decentralize further because “their customers’ regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control.” While he said that approach may be appropriate for those users, he added that such systems should not be described as scaling Ethereum. “This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not 'scaling Ethereum' in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap,” Buterin wrote.” Instead, Buterin suggested viewing layer-2s as a spectrum of networks with different levels of connection to Ethereum, each offering different trade-offs. He said layer-2s should focus on providing value beyond basic scaling, such as privacy features, application-specific design, ultra-fast transaction confirmation, or non-financial use cases, and be clear with users about what guarantees they provide. Read more: Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin warns decentralized stablecoins still have deep flaws Vitalik Buterin Ethereum News AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards . For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy .