Crypto ETFs with staking can supercharge returns but they may not be for everyone

Markets Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email Crypto ETFs with staking can supercharge returns but they may not be for everyone From yield potential to custody risks, here’s how direct ETH and staking funds compare for different investor goals. By Helene Braun | Edited by Aoyon Ashraf Jan 25, 2026, 3:00 p.m. Make us preferred on Google Ether holding vs staking ETFs (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images) What to know : Investors can now choose between owning ether directly or buying shares in a staking ETF that earns rewards on their behalf. While staking ETFs offers yield, they come with risks and less control than holding ETH in an exchange or wallet. Grayscale’s Ethereum staking ETF recently paid $0.083178 per share, yielding $3.16 in rewards on a $1,000 investment. Investing in crypto assets like ether, the native token of the Ethereum network, once followed a simple path: traders bought coins on platforms like Coinbase or Robinhood, or stored them in self-custody wallets such as MetaMask, and held them directly. Then came staking , or pledging a certain amount of cryptocurrencies to a network to validate transactions and earn rewards. This was seen as a way for investors to generate passive income while holding the tokens through crypto exchanges in anticipation of price appreciation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW Don't miss another story. Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today . See all newsletters Sign me up By signing up, you will receive emails about CoinDesk products and you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . However, as crypto has moved closer to mainstream finance, new products such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track spot prices now sit alongside direct ownership, giving investors more choice — but also more decisions to make. If that wasn't enough, the ETFs that track ether, intended to provide traditional investors with easier access to ETH exposure, now offer staking products. These funds not only provide exposure to the ether price but also offer the potential for passive income through staking yields. For example, crypto asset manager Grayscale, earlier this month , was the first fund to pay shareholders staking rewards for its Ethereum Staking ETF (ETHE). Investors received $0.083178 per share, meaning that if someone purchased $1,000 worth of ETHE shares, which at that time traded at $25.87, they would have earned $82.78. This leaves investors with a tough question: Is it better to buy and hold spot ETH outright via a crypto exchange or to purchase an ETF that stakes it on their behalf? Yield vs ownership At its core, the decision comes down to two factors: ownership and yield. When an investor buys ETH directly through an exchange like Coinbase or Robinhood, they’re buying the actual crypto asset. Investors gain or lose money depending on whether the price increases or decreases, while the exchange holds the asset on their behalf. If they choose to stake that ETH through Coinbase, the platform handles the staking process, and the investor earns rewards — typically around 3% to 5% annually — minus a commission that the exchange collects on those rewards. While this approach doesn’t require managing validators or running software, it still keeps the investor within the crypto ecosystem, allowing them to transfer, unstake, or use their ETH elsewhere. On the other hand, if an investor chooses to buy shares of an ether ETF, that fund would purchase ETH on their behalf, without the investor ever having to log in or create a crypto wallet. And if that ETF has a staking component, the fund that buys ETH will stake it and earn rewards on behalf of the investors. Fees are another major difference. Grayscale’s Ethereum Trust (ETHE), for instance, charges a 2.5% annual management fee, which applies regardless of market conditions. If the fund also stakes ETH, a separate cut goes to the fund’s staking provider before any earnings are passed on to shareholders. Coinbase, by contrast, doesn’t charge an annual management fee to hold ETH, but it does take up to 35% of any staking rewards, which is a standard practice for any platform offering yield on staking, although the fees can vary. "There is no fee to stake your assets. Coinbase takes a commission based on the rewards you receive from the network. Our standard commission is 35% for ADA, ATOM, AVAX, DOT, ETH, MATIC, SOL, and XTZ," according to the Coinbase website disclosure . The fees are lower for someone who is part of Coinbase's paid premium membership. That makes the effective yield from staking typically higher on Coinbase than through a staking ETF, though the ETF structure may appeal more to investors who want simplicity and access through a traditional brokerage account. In other words, investors will have exposure to ETH price moves and passive income from staking, without ever having to understand what a crypto exchange or wallet is. All they have to do is buy the stocks of that staking ETF. It’s like earning yield from a fund that invests into dividend-paying companies — except, in the case of staking ETFs, the rewards come from the blockchain, not a company. Sounds fairly easy, which is one of the reasons these ETF products became so popular in the first place. However, there are some caveats. First, income generation isn't guaranteed. Just like traditional stock-related ETFs, these staking funds are subject to risks, such as fluctuating yields. Imagine this scenario: if a company suddenly cuts its dividend, it may lower the yield of the fund held by the investors. Similarly, staking rewards vary. The staking rewards are based on network activity and the total amount of cryptocurrency staked. Right now, for ETH, the annual yield is around 2.8%, according to CoinDesk data . Annualized staking yield of the Ethereum validator population. (CoinDesk CESR ) But those rewards aren’t guaranteed and fluctuate as the chart shows. And if something goes wrong with the staking operation — say the validator fails or gets penalized — the fund could lose part of its ETH. The same is true when staking through Coinbase: while the platform handles technical details, rewards still fluctuate, and poor validator performance could reduce returns. That said, staking through Coinbase offers more flexibility than an ETF — you retain ownership of your ETH and can choose to unstake or transfer it, something ETF shareholders can’t do. There’s also the matter of access and control. Even when an investor holds ETH on an exchange like Coinbase or Robinhood, they are still part of the crypto ecosystem. If someone ever wants to transfer their ETH to a wallet or use it in DeFi apps, they can (though Robinhood's withdrawal process adds complexity). With an Ethereum ETF, that flexibility disappears. Investors don’t hold ETH directly and can’t transfer it to a wallet, stake it independently, or use it in DeFi protocols. Their exposure is limited to buying or selling ETF shares through a brokerage account, meaning access to the asset is entirely mediated by the fund structure and traditional market hours rather than the blockchain itself. Which is better? So, which one is better? The answer lies in what investors are looking for from these products. If they are looking for yield without managing keys or validators, a staking fund might be a good option. Even if the fees are eating into the total returns. However, if an investor values direct ownership, long-term flexibility, or is willing to stake ETH themselves, holding crypto on a wallet or an exchange may be the better option. Plus, they can avoid the fund management fees (although they will still need to pay various transaction fees). Ethereum ETF Staking More For You KuCoin Hits Record Market Share as 2025 Volumes Outpace Crypto Market By CoinDesk Research Dec 22, 2025 Commissioned by KuCoin KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market. What to know : KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025 , equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month , marking its strongest year on record. This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume , as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes , which slowed during periods of lower market volatility. Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split , each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line. Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity , reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover. Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity , indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes. View Full Report More For You Here’s why bitcoin’s is failing its role as a 'safe haven' versus gold By Francisco Rodrigues | Edited by Aoyon Ashraf 18 hours ago Bitcoin behaves more like an "ATM" during uncertain times, with investors quickly selling it to raise cash. What to know : During recent geopolitical tensions, Bitcoin lost 6.6% of its value, while gold rose 8.6%, demonstrating bitcoin's vulnerability in times of market stress. Bitcoin behaves more like an "ATM" during uncertain times, with investors quickly selling it to raise cash, contrary to its reputation as a stable digital asset. Gold remains the preferred hedge for short-term risks, while bitcoin is better suited for long-term monetary and geopolitical uncertainties that unfold over years. Read full story Latest Crypto News Sui Group charts new course for crypto treasuries with stablecoins and DeFi 1 hour ago The big U.S. crypto bill is on the move. Here is what it means for everyday users 2 hours ago The fight over stablecoin yield isn’t really about stablecoins 17 hours ago Here’s why bitcoin’s is failing its role as a 'safe haven' versus gold 18 hours ago Coinbase CEO says Big banks now view crypto as an ‘existential’ threat to their business 19 hours ago Agora's Nick van Eck bets on stablecoin boom in enterprise payments 21 hours ago Top Stories Here's what bitcoin bulls are saying as price remains stuck during global rally 22 hours ago Ethereum Foundation makes post quantum security a top priority as new team forms Jan 24, 2026 Bitcoin’s weakness versus gold and equities puts quantum computing fears back in focus Jan 24, 2026 Senate Agriculture's crypto market structure draft peppered with Democrat pitches Jan 23, 2026 Here is why investors are snubbing Michael Saylor’s 10% dividend offer in Europe Jan 24, 2026 Days of our market structure bills: State of Crypto Jan 24, 2026