While quantum computing is not an immediate threat to bitcoin, the resurfacing debate and perceived lack of a unified, visible long-term preparation plan are creating 'quiet friction' and unease among institutional investors concerned with distant risks. this could lead to hesitation in long-term capital allocation.
The article is from coindesk, a reputable crypto news outlet, and quotes prominent figures in the bitcoin space like adam back and nic carter, providing a balanced view from both developers and investors.
The immediate price impact is not expected to be significant as the threat is theoretical and decades away. however, the 'quiet friction weighing on sentiment' for long-term institutional capital suggests a slight underlying pressure that could temper bullish enthusiasm over an extended period, leading to a neutral to slightly bearish sentiment for long-term holding strategies.
The article emphasizes that quantum machines capable of breaking bitcoin's cryptography are 'unlikely to exist for decades.' the debate affects long-term institutional investment strategy and network development, rather than short-term market movements.
Tech Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email Bitcoin’s quantum debate is resurfacing, and markets are starting to notice Quantum computing is not currently an existential threat to Bitcoin, but as capital becomes more institutional and long-term, even distant risks require clearer answers. By Shaurya Malwa | Edited by Cheyenne Ligon Dec 20, 2025, 2:00 p.m. What to know : The majority of Bitcoin developers argue that quantum computing does not pose an immediate threat to the network, with machines capable of breaking its cryptography unlikely to exist for decades. Critics express concern over the lack of preparation for quantum threats, as governments and companies begin adopting quantum-resistant systems. The Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP)-360 aims to introduce quantum-resistant address formats, allowing users to gradually transition to more secure cryptographic standards. Quantum computing and the threat it poses to encrypted blockchains has once again crept into online bitcoin conversations, raising concerns that it poses a long-term risk that investors and developers are still struggling to talk about in the same language. The latest flare-up in the debate followed comments from prominent Bitcoin developers pushing back against claims that quantum computers pose any real risk to the network in the foreseeable future. Their view is straightforward: that machines capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography do not exist today and are unlikely to for decades. STORY CONTINUES BELOW Don't miss another story. Subscribe to the The Protocol Newsletter today . See all newsletters Sign me up By signing up, you will receive emails about CoinDesk products and you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Adam Back, co-founder of Bitcoin infrastructure firm Blockstream, described the risk as effectively nonexistent in the near term, calling quantum computing “ridiculously early” and riddled with unresolved research problems. Even in a worst-case scenario, Back argued, Bitcoin’s design would not allow coins to be instantly stolen across the network. https://x.com/adam3us/status/2001589051317719400 Back’s assessment is broadly shared among protocol developers. Critics, however, say the problem isn’t the timeline, but it’s the lack of visible preparation. Bitcoin relies on elliptic curve cryptography to secure wallets and authorize transactions. As CoinDesk previously explained , sufficiently advanced quantum computers running Shor’s algorithm — a quantum algorithm used to find the prime factors of big numbers — could derive private keys from exposed public keys , putting a portion of existing coins at risk. The network wouldn’t collapse overnight, but funds sitting in older address formats — including Satoshi Nakamoto’s 1.1 million bitcoins, which have been untouched since 2010 — could become vulnerable to threat actors For now, that threat remains theoretical. Yet governments and large enterprises are already acting as if quantum disruption is inevitable. The U.S. has outlined plans to phase out classical cryptography by the mid-2030s, while companies such as Cloudflare and Apple have begun rolling out quantum-resistant systems. Bitcoin, by contrast, has not yet agreed on a concrete transition plan. And that gap is where market unease is creeping in. Nic Carter, a partner at Castle Island Ventures, said on X that the disconnect between developers and investors is becoming hard to ignore. Capital, he argues, is less concerned with whether quantum attacks arrive in five years or 15, and more focused on whether Bitcoin has a credible path forward if cryptography standards change. https://x.com/nic_carter/status/2001654123775857129 Plans to fight back Developers counter that Bitcoin can adapt well before any real danger appears. Proposals exist to migrate users toward quantum-resistant address formats and, in extreme cases, restrict spending from legacy wallets. All of this would be preventive rather than reactive. One such plan is the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP)-360 , which introduces a new type of Bitcoin address designed to use quantum-resistant cryptography. It provides users with a means to transfer their coins into wallets that rely on different mathematical algorithms, which are believed to be far more resistant to cracking by quantum computers. BIP360 outlines three new signature methods, each offering varying levels of protection, so the network can gradually shift rather than force a sudden upgrade. Nothing would change automatically. Users would opt in over time by moving funds to the new address format. https://x.com/caprioleio/status/2001492235003859271 Supporters of BIP360 argue the proposal is less about predicting when quantum computers arrive and more about preparation. Moving Bitcoin to a new cryptographic standard could take years, involving software updates, infrastructure changes, and user coordination. Starting early, they say, reduces the risk of being forced into rushed decisions later. However, Bitcoin’s conservative governance becomes a challenge when addressing long-horizon threats that require early consensus. Quantum computing is not currently an existential threat to Bitcoin, and no credible timeline suggests otherwise. However, as capital becomes more institutional and long-term, even distant risks require clearer answers. Until developers and investors converge on a shared framework, the quantum question will continue to linger — not as a panic, but as a quiet friction weighing on sentiment. quantum computing Satoshi Nakamoto More For You Protocol Research: GoPlus Security By CoinDesk Research Nov 14, 2025 Commissioned by GoPlus What to know : As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M. GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month. Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B. View Full Report More For You Most Influential: Hsiao-Wei Wang and Tomasz K. Stańczak By Margaux Nijkerk | Edited by Cheyenne Ligon 23 hours ago The Ethereum Foundation’s new leaders hope to bring in a new era for the second-largest cryptocurrency. Read full story Latest Crypto News BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF rare fund with massive 2025 inflows despite negative performance 1 min. ago Gold wins the debasement trade in 2025, but it is not the full story 1 hour ago The UK’s crypto rulebook is finally taking shape 2 hours ago Crypto's closest ally in Congress, Sen. Lummis, is retiring next year 16 hours ago SBF's cohorts at FTX take last SEC hit, Ellison banned from company roles for decade 19 hours ago Bitcoin gets 'base case' price target of $143,000 at Citigroup 21 hours ago Top Stories Gold wins the debasement trade in 2025, but it is not the full story 1 hour ago The UK’s crypto rulebook is finally taking shape 2 hours ago Crypto's closest ally in Congress, Sen. Lummis, is retiring next year 16 hours ago Bitcoin battles $89,000 price ceiling as bulls try to break U.S. sell pattern 21 hours ago SBF's cohorts at FTX take last SEC hit, Ellison banned from company roles for decade 19 hours ago Federal Reserve moves toward narrower, crypto-driven take on master accounts 21 hours ago