MSCI Isn't Wrong to Be Cautious on DATs

Opinion Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email MSCI Isn't Wrong to Be Cautious on DATs As leading index provider MSCI considers excluding digital asset treasuries (DATs) from its suite of indexes, it’s worth considering the risk profile of these investment vehicles to determine if they truly meet these benchmarks, says Nic Puckrin, co-founder of Coin Bureau. By Nic Puckrin | Edited by Cheyenne Ligon Dec 13, 2025, 4:00 p.m. The news that MSCI — one of the world’s “Big Three” index providers — is looking to potentially exclude digital asset treasuries (DATs) from its indexes has absolutely scandalized the crypto community. JP Morgan mentioning this in their research note on Strategy only added fuel to the fire, with the term “Operation Chokepoint” coming back into the Crypto Twitter lexicon. However, MSCI may have a valid point when it comes to DATs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW Don't miss another story. Subscribe to the CoinDesk Headlines Newsletter today . See all newsletters Sign me up By signing up, you will receive emails about CoinDesk products and you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . MSCI is one of the largest index providers in the world, with over $18 trillion in ETFs and institutional assets following its benchmarks. As such, investor protection is a key part of their role — and, indeed, they clearly and repeatedly state so in their index methodology documents. If they approve an asset for inclusion into one of their indexes, it has real clout. And, unfortunately, it is questionable whether DATs truly meet these benchmarks. The rise and fall of DATs Until very recently, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) was the only Bitcoin treasury game in town. Originally a software business, Strategy (under the ticker MSTR) slowly transitioned further and further away from its core activity under the leadership of Michael Saylor to become, essentially, a leveraged BTC play listed on the traditional stock market. And it did really well as a result. From its first Bitcoin buy in August 2020 to the peak in June 2025, MSTR’s share price soared over 3,000% . It was so successful, in fact, that many other companies decided they wanted a piece of the pie. And so, this year, the DAT trend exploded — their number increased from just 4 in 2020 to 142 by October 2025, more than half of these coming into existence this year alone. We now even have corporate entities investing in tokens like DOGE, ZEC, or WLFI, whose volatility is far greater than BTC. But that’s not the only problem. Many of these new corporate entities raised funds to buy crypto on much more unfavorable terms than Strategy, whose unsecured convertible debt gives it a great deal of flexibility when it comes to repayments. Some others, meanwhile, have issued secured debt — meaning they face stricter collateral demands and have far less wiggle room — and on top of this, bought crypto at far higher average prices. Max pain As a result, DATs are now hurting from the brutal crypto sell-off over recent weeks. The crash nearly halved the combined market cap of DATs from July’s $176 billion peak to about $99 billion in mid-November, while many are now trading below their net asset values (NAVs) . For investors looking to buy these stocks at this point in the market, this can potentially represent a discount — if they see future value, which is a big if. In the meantime, early investors are feeling the pain, as the stock prices of crypto treasuries tumble. Even Strategy’s shares are down 40% year-to-date , and Tom Lee’s BitMine is trading nearly 80% down from its all-time high (though shares are up nearly 300% YTD ). Saylor and Lee, however, have structured their vehicles well enough to have the luxury of buying the dip —which both of them have been doing. Others have not fared quite so well. After their shares suffered brutal sell-offs, several DATs have already been forced to sell their crypto holdings — almost certainly at a loss — to fund share buybacks. A few weeks ago, ETH treasury firm ETHZilla sold $40 million in tokens, while FG Nexus was forced to sell over 10,922 ETH to re-purchase some 8% of its publicly tradable shares. Similarly, in early November, BTC treasury Sequans sold 970 Bitcoin to redeem half of its convertible debt. These types of forced liquidations are highly unusual for publicly traded companies, especially so soon after launch, and clearly point to structural issues. It really feels like we’re seeing the dominoes begin to fall, and we’re not even anywhere near a crypto winter yet. For now, this is no more than a relatively standard bull market correction. So it’s particularly concerning that these companies are hurting so badly now —what will happen if we see something more akin to the 2022 downturn? As someone who closely watches the crypto market on a daily basis, I have been concerned about the systemic risk of DATs for a while. So why shouldn’t MSCI be concerned about including these assets in its indexes? Its approval would signal that DATs are investable, well-governed, and sufficiently transparent. Conversely, excluding them suggests an unacceptable level of risk, structural issues, or concerns about liquidity or governance. It’s easy to see how many DATs fall into the latter category. The TradFi game Of course, not all DATs are made equal. While a large proportion of crypto companies on the market today will likely not survive a real downturn, the likes of BitMine and Strategy will almost certainly be fine. So there’s an argument that MSCI is throwing the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to these companies. Overall, though, MSCI isn’t wrong to be cautious on DATs. Many of them are risky vehicles that have jumped on the hype train in the hopes of quick gains. Excluding them from major investment indexes isn’t the sign of some sort of coordinated attack on crypto as a whole — it's just TradFi being cautious and looking to protect investors. And as crypto increasingly becomes integrated with the traditional financial ecosystem, this is a part of it all of us will simply have to accept. These are the growing pains that come with a major change. But in the end, these stringent standards could be a blessing in disguise. Over time, they may strengthen the case for legitimate digital asset treasuries – while weeding out the risky, badly structured firms, before they can become a systemic risk. MSCI Strategy Digital Asset Treasury Note: The views expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinDesk, Inc. or its owners and affiliates . More For You Protocol Research: GoPlus Security By CoinDesk Research Nov 14, 2025 Commissioned by GoPlus What to know : As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M. GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month. Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B. View Full Report More For You Trump's National Security Strategy Ignores Bitcoin and Blockchain By Omkar Godbole , AI Boost | Edited by Stephen Alpher Dec 7, 2025 The U.S. president's latest national security strategy focused on AI, biotech, and quantum computing. What to know : U.S. President Donald Trump's latest national security strategy omits digital assets, focusing instead on AI, biotech, and quantum computing. The administration's strategic Bitcoin reserve was created using seized BTC, not new purchases. Read full story Latest Crypto News Brazil’s Largest Asset Manager Recommends Investors Put Up to 3% of their Money in Bitcoin to Hedge Against FX, Market Shocks 17 minutes ago State of Crypto: Policymakers Dominated Most Influential 2025 1 hour ago Bank of Japan Set to Hike Rates to 30-Year High, Posing Another Threat to Bitcoin 2 hours ago Crypto’s Machine Learning ‘iPhone Moment’ Comes Closer as AI Agents Trade the Market 3 hours ago U.S. Market Structure Bill May Slide to January as Talks Continue Over Several Points 4 hours ago Citadel Securities and DeFi Waging War of Words Through SEC Correspondence 17 hours ago Top Stories Crypto Firm Tether Says It Wants to Take Over Italian Football Club Juventus 19 hours ago Five Crypto Firms Win Initial Approvals as Trust Banks, Including Ripple, Circle, BitGo 23 hours ago Bitcoin Plunges Below $90K as AI Worries Drag Nasdaq, Crypto Stocks Down 23 hours ago U.S. SEC Gives Implicit Nod for Tokenized Stocks Dec 12, 2025 Most Influential: Tom Lee Dec 12, 2025 Ripple Payments Lands First European Bank Client in AMINA Dec 12, 2025