Polymarket's move to hire an in-house team to trade against customers raises significant concerns about conflict of interest, market neutrality, and potential data advantages, blurring the lines with traditional sportsbooks. this erodes trust in the prediction market model and could indirectly affect sentiment for other decentralized finance (defi) platforms that rely on transparency and fairness, though direct impact on major cryptocurrencies is likely limited.
The article is from coindesk, a reputable crypto news source, and cites a statistics professor (harry crane) and bloomberg, providing well-reasoned arguments and expert opinions on the risks involved.
While the news creates a bearish sentiment for the specific prediction market sector due to trust erosion and potential conflicts of interest, its direct impact on the broader crypto market (like btc or eth) is likely neutral, as polymarket is a niche platform. however, it highlights a fundamental risk to the 'trustless' nature often touted in the web3 space, which could subtly weigh on broader defi sentiment long-term.
Reputational damage and the erosion of trust in a platform's neutrality are not short-term issues. they can have lasting consequences on user adoption, platform viability, and the overall perception of decentralized prediction markets and similar defi initiatives.
Finance Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email Polymarket Hiring In-House Team to Trade Against Customers — Here's Why It's a Risk The prediction market’s move toward internal market making could blur the line with sportsbooks and undermine the platform’s neutrality, experts warn. By Oliver Knight | Edited by Stephen Alpher Updated Dec 5, 2025, 10:34 a.m. Published Dec 5, 2025, 10:34 a.m. Polymarket to hire in-house trading team (Polymarket modified by CoinDesk) What to know : Polymarket is exploring an internal market-making team that would trade directly against users, a shift critics say resembles a traditional sportsbook rather than a prediction market. Statistics professor Harry Crane argues the move offers limited revenue upside and significant PR, legal and trust risks, citing concerns over optics, potential data advantages and parallels to controversies at Kalshi and NoVig. Observers worry the desk could erode Polymarket’s reputation as a market-driven probability gauge, a key factor in its prominence during the 2024 election cycle. Prediction market Polymarket is in the process of hiring an internal market-making team that will trade directly against customers — a shift that could blur the lines between a prediction market and a traditional sportsbook. The company has recently spoken to traders and sports bettors about building the new desk, according to Bloomberg , citing people familiar with the matter. The move follows a similar step by rival Kalshi, which has defended its own in-house trading team as a way to improve liquidity and the user experience. STORY CONTINUES BELOW Don't miss another story. Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today . See all newsletters Sign me up By signing up, you will receive emails about CoinDesk products and you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . In practice, however, hiring external market makers is entirely possible, raising questions about Polymarket’s true motivation. The decision appears focused less on product improvement and more on generating revenue. “They don’t charge fees. They don’t make money. They want to find a way to monetize,” Harry Crane, a statistics professor at Rutgers University, told CoinDesk. Crane said Polymarket plans to offer parlays through an RFQ protocol, with the in-house desk pricing and matching those bets. “These require significant capital to back and also offer a substantial edge for the house if executed correctly,” he said. “I think it’s short-sighted and ultimately a mistake, but time will tell.” A small revenue stream with outsized risks Crane also questioned the financial logic behind the strategy. “Given the huge valuations, it’s not a viable strategy to monetize, if that’s the objective,” he said. “Assuming the trading desk is profitable — which is far from a given — the amount it can profit is a pittance compared to its valuation.” More importantly, Crane warned, the company can’t afford for the desk to be too profitable. “The company should not want an in-house trading team to be too profitable, as that will create significant PR problems and possible legal issues,” he said. “Just look at the class-action against Kalshi for doing the same. That lawsuit appears to be 100% frivolous, but the optics and PR are not positive.” Beyond the legal risks, Crane argued the move undermines Polymarket’s strategic identity. “This diminishes Polymarket's opportunity to differentiate itself from the competition, and it dedicates resources and focus to something that is definitively not what got the company to this point.” A shift toward a sportsbook model This change makes Polymarket resemble a sportsbook, where users effectively trade against the house rather than other bettors. At a sportsbook, in-house traders set prices and build in vigorish — typically giving the operator a 5%–10% edge. Polymarket’s foray into this territory could create a conflict of interest and unsettle bettors who joined prediction markets precisely because they weren’t sportsbooks. Markets would no longer reflect the collective wisdom of traders but instead the pricing decisions of Polymarket’s internal desk. It also risks eroding Polymarket’s reputation as a barometer of real-world probabilities. That reputation was a key engine of its rapid growth during the 2024 U.S. election cycle, when news outlets routinely cited Polymarket alongside polling data, boosting its mainstream legitimacy. Blurring lines and raising questions Crane said the sportsbook comparison understates the problem. “Does it blur the line between a prediction market and a traditional sportsbook? Yes, but it's worse than that,” he said. “At a sportsbook it is well understood that the book is the counterparty, and will use whatever information it can to get the edge over its customers. Exchanges are supposed to be different.” “But as long as there are in-house or privileged participants on an exchange, there will always be suspicions that they are gaining an unfair advantage,” Crane added, pointing to a recent controversy at NoVig, which voided a number of winning bets because its in-house market maker was the losing counterparty. The introduction of an internal desk also raises operational and ethical questions reminiscent of the FTX-Alameda dynamic. How much order-flow or deposit-timing data will the desk have access to? Could it trade ahead of customer flows? Or will it simply post liquidity and collect spread, as some exchanges claim? A risk to brand and trust While market making may create a new revenue stream, the shift threatens the perceived neutrality and trust that helped Polymarket rise to prominence. The company did not immediately respond to CoinDesk’s request for comment. Setting aside questions of fairness, Crane believes the strategy is simply misguided. “It’s a bad business decision that takes a platform that previously felt very new and different and instead makes it look and feel just like everyone else,” he said. Polymarket Prediction Markets More For You Protocol Research: GoPlus Security By CoinDesk Research Nov 14, 2025 Commissioned by GoPlus What to know : As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M. GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month. Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B. View Full Report More For You Kraken Launches High-Touch VIP Program for Ultra High Net Worth Clients By Ian Allison | Edited by Sam Reynolds 3 hours ago Kraken VIP members are paired with a specialist relationship manager, backed by 24/7 support and early insight into Kraken’s full product ecosystem. What to know : Kraken is also offering its VIPs access to “extraordinary experiences,” such as Formula 1, football, cultural events and intimate regional meet-ups not available to the general public. Membership to Kraken VIP requires a $10 million average balance on platform or $80M in annual trading volume. Read full story Latest Crypto News Kraken Launches High-Touch VIP Program for Ultra High Net Worth Clients 3 hours ago Solana, XRP, ETH Extend Losses as Bitcoin’s $91K Support Back in Focus 4 hours ago DOGE ETF Buzz Meets Bearish Reality as Dogecoin Prints Fresh Lower Lows 5 hours ago XRP at Risk of $2.05 Retest, Analysts Warn, as Bitcoin Gives Back Weekly Gains 5 hours ago Here's How Much Bitcoin, XRP, Ether, Solana May Move on Friday's Inflation Report 6 hours ago Asia Morning Briefing: Crypto’s Next Breakout Will Come From Infrastructure, Not Narratives, Hashed Says 8 hours ago Top Stories Kraken Launches High-Touch VIP Program for Ultra High Net Worth Clients 3 hours ago Sovereign Wealth Funds Were Buyers as Bitcoin Plunged: BlackRock's Larry Fink 17 hours ago Coinbase, Chainlink Introduce Base-Solana Bridge to Link Ecosystems 15 hours ago Ex-Signature Bank Execs Launch Blockchain-Powered Narrow Bank Backed by Paradigm, Winklevoss 16 hours ago Kraken Partners With Deutsche Börse as Europe Looks to Rival Wall Street in Crypto 13 hours ago Crypto Investor Donates $12M to UK's Reform Party 16 hours ago